Skip to content
Laptop Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Acer Nitro V 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 4060 or MSI Cyborg A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 260 RTX 5050?

Cyborg A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 260 RTX 5050 costs $60 less today; Nitro V 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 4060 has score 0.1 higher (7.8 vs. 7.7).

Acer wins 1by componentMSI wins 2

  • 8.3Performance7.9
  • 7.3Memory and storage8.3
  • 8.8Screen7.4
  • 5.0Ports and how current it is6.3

MSI Cyborg A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 260 RTX 5050 is $60 the cheaper

$1,290

today

No history yet

$1,230

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Nitro V 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 4060 wins on screen; Cyborg A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 260 RTX 5050 wins on memory and storage and ports and how current it is.

  • 8.3Performance7.9
  • 7.3Memory and storage8.3 (wins)
  • 8.8 (wins)Screen7.4
  • 5.0Ports and how current it is6.3 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Spec sheet side by side

ItemNitro V 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 4060Cyborg A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 260 RTX 5050
Performance
Processor changesCore i7Ryzen 7
Processor model changes14650HX260
Dedicated graphics card changesRTX 4060RTX 5050
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage changes512 GB1,024 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD
Screen
Size changes16 polegadas15.6 polegadas
Resolution changesQHDFull HD
Refresh rate changes180Hz144Hz
Connections
Wi-Fi generation changesWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
General
System changesnot listedWindows
Model code changes14650HXB2HWEKG

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.