Skip to content
Laptop Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Acer Aspire Go 15.6″ Core i3-N305 or Lenovo IdeaPad 1 Gen 7 15.6″ Core i3-1215U?

Aspire Go 15.6″ Core i3-N305 costs $324 less today; IdeaPad 1 Gen 7 15.6″ Core i3-1215U has score 0.4 higher (5.0 vs. 4.6).

Acer wins 1by componentLenovo wins 1

  • 3.5Performance3.5
  • 3.5Memory and storage8.3
  • 8.5Screen5.5
  • 2.5Ports and how current it is2.5

Acer Aspire Go 15.6″ Core i3-N305 is $324 the cheaper

$395

today

No history yet

$719

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Aspire Go 15.6″ Core i3-N305 wins on screen; IdeaPad 1 Gen 7 15.6″ Core i3-1215U wins on memory and storage.

  • 3.5Performance3.5
  • 3.5Memory and storage8.3 (wins)
  • 8.5 (wins)Screen5.5
  • 2.5Ports and how current it is2.5

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAspire Go 15.6″ Core i3-N305IdeaPad 1 Gen 7 15.6″ Core i3-1215U
Performance
ProcessorCore i3Core i3
Processor model changesN3051215U
RAM changes8 GB16 GB
Storage changes128 GB1,024 GB
Storage type changesnot listedSSD
Screen
Size15.6 polegadas15.6 polegadas
Resolution changes4KFull HD
Screen type changesIPSnot listed
Connections
Wi-Fi generationWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
General
SystemWindowsWindows
Model code changesLPDDR51215U

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.