Samsung QN80H 85″
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
8.9 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.5
Buy on AmazonUpdated 6 Nov, 2026
P7K 85″ costs £200 less today; QN80H 85″ has score 0.5 higher (8.9 vs. 8.4).
8.9score · higher
8.4score
Samsung wins 2by componentTCL wins 1
Samsung QN80H 85″ is cheaperTCL P7K 85″ is £200 cheaper
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Both work. TCL P7K 85″ is £200 cheaper.
Both work. TCL P7K 85″ is £200 cheaper.
Both work. TCL P7K 85″ is £200 cheaper.
Both work. TCL P7K 85″ is £200 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Televisions for gaming, Televisions for the bedroom and kitchen.
QN80H 85″ wins on gaming and recency.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
8.9 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.5
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
8.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Updated 06/11/2026
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the TV; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real contrast or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.