Which monitor is better? Compare two
442 new monitors to compare on price, score and specs; collected 6 Nov.
Pick a size. Applies to all pages ·
442 new monitors, catalog as of 6 Nov 2026. The page address saves your choice.
- score 5.5
AOC
24G4HREAD£100
No history yet · today
- score 7.0
Samsung
LS27FG702EUXXU£429
No history yet · today
AAOC 24G4HREAD
BSamsung LS27FG702EUXXU
AOC 24G4HREAD wins in 2 fields, Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU in 4.
What each one has that the other lacks
- AAOC 24G4HREADwins in 2
- BSamsung LS27FG702EUXXUwins in 4
- Collected price: AOC 24G4HREAD wins with $100 against $429, 329 £ less. The price collected today, from a trusted seller.
- Spec sheet score: Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU wins with 7.0 against 5.5, +1.5 pts. Sum of image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency.
- image score: Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU wins with 7.0 against 2.5, +4.5 pts.
- connections score: AOC 24G4HREAD wins with 6.0 against 5.0, +1.0 pts.
- Pixel density: Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU wins with 163 ppi against 92 ppi, +71 ppi. Sharper text and images.
- Refresh rate: Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU wins with 360 Hz against 260 Hz, +100 Hz. More frames per second by the specs.
See full specsHide specs
| Field | AOC 24G4HREAD | Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU |
|---|---|---|
| Price and score | ||
| Collected price | $100 | $429 |
| Spec sheet score | 5.5 | 7.0 |
| Score by component | ||
| image score | 2.5 | 7.0 |
| smoothness score | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| connections score | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| ergonomics score | no data | 4.0 |
| recency score | no data | no data |
| Spec sheet | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Screen size | 24.0 ″ | 27.0 ″ |
| Colour | no data | no data |
| Release year | no data | no data |
| Image | ||
| Resolution | Full HD | 4K |
| Pixel density | 92 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Panel | no data | no data |
| Stated HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Curved screen | no data | no data |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 260 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1.0 ms | 1.0 ms |
| Sync | G-Sync | no data |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | no data | no data |
| USB-C with laptop charging | no data | no data |
| Built-in speaker | yes | no data |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | no data | yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) | no data | no data |
| VESA mount holes | no data | no data |
Prices as of 06/11, they may change at the store. Score by specs, from 0 to 10. How we calculate →
Next step
Still undecided between the two?
See where each one stands among all the new monitors, by price and score.
Frequently asked questions
What does the comparison show?
Price, spec sheet score, the score for each component (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency) and the spec sheet. On each row with a rule, we mark the one that wins.
Why do some fields show "no data"?
Because the catalog doesn’t list that detail for the monitor, and we’d rather show the gap than make up a number. A field with no data on one side doesn’t count for either.
Where does the price of each monitor come from?
This is the lowest price from a trusted seller on the date we checked. It changes without notice. The buy button goes straight to the store, where the price of the day applies.
Read next
Where the numbers come from
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. Who wins on each row: the highest value for score and for fields where more is better; the lowest for price. Fields where higher doesn’t mean better appear without marking a winner.
The comparison uses the catalog specs and the Radar spec score. It doesn’t measure the real calibration, durability or what buyers think.
Data from 6 Nov 2026.