Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

Philips 34M2C6500 or Samsung LS32BG650EUXXU?

Cost the same today; LS32BG650EUXXU has score 0.5 higher (4.4 vs. 3.9).

Samsung LS32BG650EUXXU

4.4score · higher

Philips wins 2by componentSamsung wins 1

  • 2.6Image1.5
  • 5.3Smoothness9.5
  • 5.0Connections3.0
  • ·Ergonomics4.0

£429

today

No history yet

£429

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

34M2C6500 wins on image and connections; LS32BG650EUXXU wins on smoothness.

  • 2.6 (wins)Image1.5
  • 5.3Smoothness9.5 (wins)
  • 5.0 (wins)Connections3.0
  • N/AErgonomics4.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

34M2C6500
LS32BG650EUXXU

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

Math34M2C6500LS32BG650EUXXU
Price per inch£12.62 menor£13.41

Spec sheet side by side

Item34M2C6500LS32BG650EUXXU
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes34 ″32 ″
ResolutionQHDQHD
Pixel density changes86 ppi92 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curved screenYesYes
Stated HDR changesHDR400not listed
Line changesEvniaOdyssey G6
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes175 Hz240 Hz
Response time (stated) changes3 ms1 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncFreesync
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports changes1not listed
Built-in speaker changesnot listedYes
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changes34M2C6500LS32BG650EUXXU

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.