Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

Philips 32E1N1800LA or Samsung LS27H800UAUXXU?

32E1N1800LA costs £91 less today; LS27H800UAUXXU has score 4.8 higher (6.5 vs. 1.7).

Philips wins 0by componentSamsung wins 2

  • 1.0Image7.0
  • 0.0Smoothness·
  • 6.0Connections7.0
  • ·Ergonomics4.0

Philips 32E1N1800LA is £91 the cheaper

£209

today

No history yet

£300

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

LS27H800UAUXXU wins on image and connections.

  • 1.0Image7.0 (wins)
  • 0.0SmoothnessN/A
  • 6.0Connections7.0 (wins)
  • N/AErgonomics4.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

32E1N1800LA
LS27H800UAUXXU

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

Math32E1N1800LALS27H800UAUXXU
Price per inch£6.53 menor£11.11

Spec sheet side by side

Item32E1N1800LALS27H800UAUXXU
Screen
TypeGeneral use and officeGeneral use and office
Size changes32 ″27 ″
Resolution changesHD4K
Pixel density changes49 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Stated HDRHDR10HDR10
Line changesnot listedViewFinity
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes60 Hznot listed
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C changesnot listedYes
Built-in speaker changesYesnot listed
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changes32E1N1800LALS27H800UAUXXU

Other comparisons

See more 72 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.