Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

Iiyama XUB3493WQSU or LG 32UR550K?

Cost the same today; 32UR550K has score 0.1 higher (4.1 vs. 4.0).

LG 32UR550K

4.1score · higher

Iiyama wins 2by componentLG wins 1

  • 2.7Image5.5
  • ·Smoothness1.5
  • 7.0Connections6.0
  • 4.0Ergonomics3.0

£240

today

No history yet

£240

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

XUB3493WQSU wins on connections and ergonomics; 32UR550K wins on image.

  • 2.7Image5.5 (wins)
  • N/ASmoothness1.5
  • 7.0 (wins)Connections6.0
  • 4.0 (wins)Ergonomics3.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

XUB3493WQSU
32UR550K

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathXUB3493WQSU32UR550K
Price per inch£7.06 menor£7.50

Spec sheet side by side

ItemXUB3493WQSU32UR550K
Screen
Type changesUltrawide (21:9 or 32:9)General use and office
Size changes34 ″32 ″
Resolution changesUWQHD4K
Pixel density changes110 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio changes21:916:9
Stated HDR changesnot listedHDR10
Line changesnot listedUltraFine
Smoothness
Refresh rate changesnot listed60 Hz
Response time (stated) changesnot listed4 ms
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C changesYesnot listed
Built-in speaker changesnot listedYes
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesYesnot listed
Pivot (portrait mode) changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changesXUB3493WQSU32UR550K

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.