Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

BenQ GW2786TC or Samsung LS32D700EAUXXU?

LS32D700EAUXXU costs £1 less today and also has score 0.1 higher (3.4 vs. 3.3).

Samsung LS32D700EAUXXU

3.4score · higher

BenQ wins 2by componentSamsung wins 1

  • 0.8Image4.5
  • 4.7Smoothness1.0
  • 7.0Connections5.0

Samsung LS32D700EAUXXU is £1 the cheaper

£201

today

No history yet

£200

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

GW2786TC wins on smoothness and connections; LS32D700EAUXXU wins on image.

  • 0.8Image4.5 (wins)
  • 4.7 (wins)Smoothness1.0
  • 7.0 (wins)Connections5.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

GW2786TC
LS32D700EAUXXU

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathGW2786TCLS32D700EAUXXU
Price per inch£7.45£6.25 menor

Spec sheet side by side

ItemGW2786TCLS32D700EAUXXU
Screen
TypeGeneral use and officeGeneral use and office
Size changes27 ″32 ″
Resolution changesFull HD4K
Pixel density changes82 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Line changesnot listedViewFinity
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes100 Hz60 Hz
Response time (stated) changesnot listed5 ms
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C changesYesnot listed
General
Model code changesGW2786TCLS32D700EAUXXU

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.