Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

Updated today

Asus VG279Q5A or Philips 27M2C5201L?

  • Price todayboth cost the same£134
  • Higher spec sheet score27M2C5201L3.5 vs. 3.2

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Score by component, side by side

VG279Q5A wins on smoothness; 27M2C5201L wins on connections.

  • 0.8Image0.8
  • 8.0 (wins)Smoothness6.5
  • 1.0Connections5.0 (wins)

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

VG279Q5A
27M2C5201L

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathVG279Q5A27M2C5201L
Price per inch£4.98£4.96 menor

Ficha técnica lado a lado

ItemVG279Q5A27M2C5201L
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size27 ″27 ″
ResolutionFull HDFull HD
Pixel density82 ppi82 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curved screen changesnot listedYes
Line changesTUF GamingEvnia
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes200 Hz180 Hz
Response time (stated) changes0.3 ms1 ms
Sync changesnot listedFreeSync
Connections
HDMI ports changesnot listed1
DisplayPort ports changesnot listed1
Built-in speaker changesYesnot listed
General
Model code changesVG279Q5A27M2C5201L

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.