Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

Asus VG257Q5A or Philips 27E1N1100A?

Cost the same today; 27E1N1100A has score 0.4 higher (3.8 vs. 3.4).

Philips 27E1N1100A

3.8score · higher

Asus wins 0by componentPhilips wins 2

  • 1.2Image0.8
  • 8.0Smoothness8.5
  • 1.0Connections3.0

£79

today

No history yet

£79

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

27E1N1100A wins on connections.

  • 1.2Image0.8
  • 8.0Smoothness8.5
  • 1.0Connections3.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

VG257Q5A
27E1N1100A

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathVG257Q5A27E1N1100A
Price per inch£3.16£2.93 menor

Spec sheet side by side

ItemVG257Q5A27E1N1100A
Screen
Type changesGaming (144 Hz or more)General use and office
Size changes25 ″27 ″
ResolutionFull HDFull HD
Pixel density changes88 ppi82 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Line changesTUF Gamingnot listed
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes200 Hz120 Hz
Response time (stated) changes0.5 ms4 ms
Connections
HDMI ports changesnot listed1
Built-in speakerYesYes
General
Model code changesVG257Q5A27E1N1100A
How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.