AOC Q27G4XFAD
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.1
Buy on AmazonUpdated 6 Nov, 2026
LS25BG400EUXXU costs £3 less today; Q27G4XFAD has score 0.1 higher (4.7 vs. 4.6).
4.7score · higher
4.6score
AOC wins 1by componentSamsung wins 1
AOC Q27G4XFAD is the cheaperSamsung LS25BG400EUXXU is £3 the cheaper
Q27G4XFAD wins on image; LS25BG400EUXXU wins on smoothness.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.1
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Updated 06/11/2026
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | Q27G4XFAD | LS25BG400EUXXU |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | £5.56 menor | £5.87 |
| Item | Q27G4XFAD | LS25BG400EUXXU |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size changes | 27 ″ | 25 ″ |
| Resolution changes | QHD | Full HD |
| Pixel density changes | 109 ppi | 88 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR10 | not listed |
| Line changes | not listed | Odyssey G4 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Sync changes | G-Sync | not listed |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | Q27G4XFAD | LS25BG400EUXXU |
Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.