Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

AOC Q27B36X or LG 27G414B?

LG 27G414B costs £1 less today; AOC Q27B36X has score 0.3 higher (3.9 vs. 3.6).

AOC Q27B36X

3.9score · higher

LG 27G414B

3.6score

AOC wins 1by componentLG wins 2

  • 3.6Image1.8
  • 3.7Smoothness4.7
  • 5.0Connections6.0

LG 27G414B is £1 the cheaper

£130

today

No history yet

£129

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

AOC Q27B36X wins on image; LG 27G414B wins on smoothness and connections.

  • 3.6 (wins)Image1.8
  • 3.7Smoothness4.7 (wins)
  • 5.0Connections6.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

AOC Q27B36X
LG 27G414B

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAOC Q27B36XLG 27G414B
Price per inch£4.81£4.78 menor

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAOC Q27B36XLG 27G414B
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size27 ″27 ″
Resolution changesQHDFull HD
Pixel density changes109 ppi82 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Stated HDRHDR10HDR10
Line changesnot listedUltraGear
Smoothness
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Response time (stated) changes4 ms1 ms
Sync changesnot listedFreeSync
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports11
Built-in speaker changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changesQ27B36X27G414B
How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.