Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

Updated today

AOC CQ27G4Z2AD or Philips 24M2N3201PL?

  • Cheapest today24M2N3201PL£81 less
  • Higher spec sheet scoreCQ27G4Z2AD5.8 vs. 5.3

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Score by component, side by side

CQ27G4Z2AD wins on image.

  • 4.1 (wins)Image2.5
  • 9.5Smoothness9.5
  • 5.0Connections5.0
  • 4.0ErgonomicsN/A

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

CQ27G4Z2AD
24M2N3201PL

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathCQ27G4Z2AD24M2N3201PL
Price per inch£6.30£3.71 menor

Ficha técnica lado a lado

ItemCQ27G4Z2AD24M2N3201PL
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes27 ″24 ″
Resolution changesQHDFull HD
Pixel density changes109 ppi92 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curved screen changesYesnot listed
Stated HDR changesHDR400HDR10
Line changesnot listedEvnia
Smoothness
Refresh rate260 Hz260 Hz
Response time (stated)1 ms1 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncG-Sync
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports11
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesYesnot listed
General
Model code changesCQ27G4Z2AD24M2N3201PL

Other comparisons

See more 1 comparison
How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.