Acer XB273KV3
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.2
Buy on AmazonUpdated 6 Nov, 2026
AOC Q25G4SR costs £116 less today; XB273KV3 has score 0.2 higher (6.4 vs. 6.2).
6.4score · higher
6.2score
Acer wins 1by componentAOC wins 1
Acer XB273KV3 is the cheaperAOC Q25G4SR is £116 the cheaper
XB273KV3 wins on image; AOC Q25G4SR wins on smoothness.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.2
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Updated 06/11/2026
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | XB273KV3 | AOC Q25G4SR |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | £10.93 | £7.16 menor |
| Item | XB273KV3 | AOC Q25G4SR |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size changes | 27 ″ | 25 ″ |
| Resolution changes | 4K | QHD |
| Pixel density changes | 163 ppi | 117 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR | HDR400 | HDR400 |
| Line changes | Predator | not listed |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 160 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 0.5 ms | 1 ms |
| Sync changes | FreeSync | G-Sync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| Built-in speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | XB273KV3 | Q25G4SR |
Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.