Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

LG 34WR55QK or Samsung LS32DG502E?

Cost the same today; LS32DG502E has score 0.3 higher (3.5 vs. 3.2).

LG 34WR55QK

3.2score

Samsung LS32DG502E

3.5score · higher

LG wins 2by componentSamsung wins 1

  • 2.1Image1.5
  • 3.3Smoothness6.5
  • 5.0Connections·
  • 4.0Ergonomics3.0

$300

today

No history yet

$300

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

34WR55QK wins on ergonomics; LS32DG502E wins on smoothness.

  • 2.1Image1.5
  • 3.3Smoothness6.5 (wins)
  • 5.0ConnectionsN/A
  • 4.0 (wins)Ergonomics3.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

34WR55QK
LS32DG502E

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

Math34WR55QKLS32DG502E
Price per inch$8.82 menor$9.37

Spec sheet side by side

Item34WR55QKLS32DG502E
Screen
Type changesUltrawide (21:9 or 32:9)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes34 ″32 ″
ResolutionQHDQHD
Pixel density changes86 ppi92 ppi
Aspect ratio changes21:916:9
Curved screen changesYesnot listed
Stated HDR changesHDR10not listed
Line changesUltraWideOdyssey
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes100 Hz180 Hz
Response time (stated) changes5 ms1 ms
Sync changesnot listedG-Sync
Connections
HDMI ports changes1not listed
DisplayPort ports changes1not listed
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesYesnot listed
VESA mount holes changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changes34WR55QKLS32DG502E

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.