Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 12, 2026

LG 32MR50C or ViewSonic VA3209M?

ViewSonic VA3209M costs $20 less today; LG 32MR50C has score 0.3 higher (2.0 vs. 1.7).

LG 32MR50C

2.0score · higher

LG wins 1by componentViewSonic wins 1

  • 0.0Image0.0
  • 4.7Smoothness3.3
  • 2.0Connections3.0

ViewSonic VA3209M is $20 the cheaper

The best for each use

By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.

Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk.

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

LG 32MR50C wins on smoothness; ViewSonic VA3209M wins on connections.

  • 0.0Image0.0
  • 4.7 (wins)Smoothness3.3
  • 2.0Connections3.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 12/11/2026

LG 32MR50C
ViewSonic VA3209M

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathLG 32MR50CViewSonic VA3209M
Price per inch$5.31$4.69 menor

Spec sheet side by side

ItemLG 32MR50CViewSonic VA3209M
Screen
TypeGeneral use and officeGeneral use and office
Size32 ″32 ″
ResolutionFull HDFull HD
Pixel density69 ppi69 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curved screen changesYesnot listed
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes100 Hz75 Hz
Response time (stated) changesnot listed4 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncnot listed
Connections
HDMI ports11
Built-in speaker changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changes32MR50CVA3209M

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.