Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 12, 2026

BenQ EW270Q or Gigabyte M27Q2?

Gigabyte M27Q2 costs $40 less today; BenQ EW270Q has score 0.4 higher (5.9 vs. 5.5).

BenQ EW270Q

5.9score · higher

BenQ wins 1by componentGigabyte wins 2

  • 4.6Image6.1
  • 7.5Smoothness7.5
  • 8.0Connections2.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics4.0

Gigabyte M27Q2 is $40 the cheaper

The best for each use

By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.

Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

BenQ EW270Q wins on connections; Gigabyte M27Q2 wins on image and ergonomics.

  • 4.6Image6.1 (wins)
  • 7.5Smoothness7.5
  • 8.0 (wins)Connections2.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics4.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 12/11/2026

BenQ EW270Q
Gigabyte M27Q2

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathBenQ EW270QGigabyte M27Q2
Price per inch$7.41$5.93 menor

Spec sheet side by side

ItemBenQ EW270QGigabyte M27Q2
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size27 ″27 ″
ResolutionQHDQHD
Pixel density109 ppi109 ppi
PanelIPSIPS
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curved screenNoNo
Stated HDR changesnot listedHDR 400
Smoothness
Refresh rate200 Hz200 Hz
Response time (stated)1 ms1 ms
Response time measurement changesGtGnot listed
Sync changesFreeSync PremiumFreesync
Connections
HDMI ports changes1not listed
DisplayPort ports changes1not listed
USB-CYesYes
Built-in speaker changesYesnot listed
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesNoYes
Pivot (portrait mode) changesNonot listed
VESA mount holes changesYesnot listed
General
Model code changesEW270QM27Q2

Other comparisons

See more 23 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.