Asus XG27AQDMG
Today
Previous check$546
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.0
Buy on AmazonAsus XG27AQDMG or MSI 272URX?
XG27AQDMG costs $319 less today and also has score 1.0 higher (7.6 vs. 6.6).
Asus XG27AQDMG
7.6score · higher
MSI 272URX
6.6score
Asus wins 1by componentMSI wins 1
- 5.1Image6.0
- 10.0Smoothness8.5
- ·Connections5.0
- 10.0Ergonomics·
Asus XG27AQDMG is $319 the cheaperMSI 272URX is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Only Asus XG27AQDMG works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. Asus XG27AQDMG is $319 cheaper.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only Asus XG27AQDMG works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
XG27AQDMG wins on smoothness.
- 5.1Image6.0
- 10.0 (wins)Smoothness8.5
- N/AConnections5.0
- 10.0ErgonomicsN/A
MSI 272URX
Today
Previous check$865
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
XG27AQDMG
- Amazon Lowest price$546Buy on Amazon
MSI 272URX
- Amazon Lowest price$865Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | XG27AQDMG | MSI 272URX |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $20.22 menor | $32.04 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | XG27AQDMG | MSI 272URX |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution changes | QHD | 4K |
| Pixel density changes | 109 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Panel changes | OLED | not listed |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | No | not listed |
| Line changes | ROG | not listed |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 0.0 ms | 3 ms |
| Response time measurement changes | GtG | not listed |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| Built-in speaker changes | No | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | Yes | not listed |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | XG27AQDMG | 272URX |
Other comparisons
XG27AQDMG orAsus PA279CDV$699 · score 6.0Compare
MSI 272URX orBenQ EX271U$370 · score 6.1Compare
XG27AQDMG orAsus PA27JCV$699 · score 4.5Compare
MSI 272URX orBenQ PD3226G$900 · score 3.6Compare
XG27AQDMG orAsus XG27AQDMGR$519 · score 5.5Compare
MSI 272URX orLG 32GX870A$820 · score 5.7Compare
See more 14 comparisons
- XG27AQDMG or Asus XG27AQWMG$620 · score 4.8
- MSI 272URX or LG 34GX900A$700 · score 4.2
- XG27AQDMG or Asus XG27UCG$439 · score 4.2
- MSI 272URX or LG 39GX90SA$1,000 · score 4.0
- XG27AQDMG or LG TRUEBLACK500$550 · score 4.3
- MSI 272URX or LG 45GX900A$1,126 · score 3.7
- XG27AQDMG or MSI 271QP$500 · score 4.9
- MSI 272URX or MSI 322UR$1,072 · score 5.9
- XG27AQDMG or MSI 271QR$706 · score 5.4
- MSI 272URX or MSI 322URX$976 · score 5.8
- XG27AQDMG or MSI 271UPXW12G$685 · score 5.5
- MSI 272URX or Samsung LS49C954UA$1,148 · score 3.3
- MSI 272URX or Samsung LS49CG954E$1,000 · score 5.7
- XG27AQDMG or MSI 274URDFW$489 · score 6.5
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.