Asus XG27ACDNG
Today
Previous check$549
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.2
Buy on AmazonAsus XG27ACDNG or MSI 274URDFW?
274URDFW costs $60 less today; XG27ACDNG has score 0.2 higher (6.7 vs. 6.5).
Asus XG27ACDNG
6.7score · higher
MSI 274URDFW
6.5score
Asus wins 2by componentMSI wins 2
- 5.1Image7.0
- 8.5Smoothness10.0
- 7.0Connections2.0
- 7.0Ergonomics3.0
Asus XG27ACDNG is the cheaperMSI 274URDFW is $60 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Only MSI 274URDFW works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. MSI 274URDFW is $60 cheaper.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only Asus XG27ACDNG works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)Up to $550On sale
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
XG27ACDNG wins on connections and ergonomics; 274URDFW wins on image and smoothness.
- 5.1Image7.0 (wins)
- 8.5Smoothness10.0 (wins)
- 7.0 (wins)Connections2.0
- 7.0 (wins)Ergonomics3.0
MSI 274URDFW
Today
Previous check$489
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
XG27ACDNG
- Amazon Lowest price$549Buy on Amazon
274URDFW
- Amazon Lowest price$489Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | XG27ACDNG | 274URDFW |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution changes | QHD | 4K |
| Pixel density changes | 109 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Panel changes | OLED | not listed |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | No | not listed |
| Stated HDR changes | not listed | HDR |
| Line changes | ROG Strix | not listed |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 360 Hz | 320 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 3 ms | 0.5 ms |
| Sync changes | G-SYNC | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | 1 | not listed |
| USB-C changes | Yes | not listed |
| Built-in speaker changes | No | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes | Yes | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | XG27ACDNG | 274URDFW |
Other comparisons
274URDFW orAsus PA279CDV$699 · score 6.0Compare
274URDFW orMSI 271QR$706 · score 5.4Compare
274URDFW orMSI 271UPXW12G$685 · score 5.5Compare
274URDFW orAmzfast 2.0$570 · score 5.0Compare
274URDFW orAsus XG27UCG$439 · score 4.2Compare
274URDFW orBenQ EX271U$370 · score 6.1Compare
See more 17 comparisons
- 274URDFW or Dell AW3425DW$700 · score 4.0
- 274URDFW or Innocn 40C1R$480 · score 3.0
- 274URDFW or Innocn 49C1G$665 · score 3.5
- 274URDFW or Innocn CB27U1$475 · score 6.2
- 274URDFW or LG 27GS93QE$545 · score 4.8
- 274URDFW or LG 27GX790A$580 · score 4.8
- 274URDFW or LG 32GX850A$752 · score 6.5
- 274URDFW or LG 32U889SA-W$740 · score 5.2
- 274URDFW or LG 34GX90SA$779 · score 4.4
- 274URDFW or LG 37G800A$500 · score 4.4
- 274URDFW or LG 37U730SA$538 · score 2.6
- 274URDFW or LG TRUEBLACK500$550 · score 4.3
- 274URDFW or MSI 271UPX12G$580 · score 6.4
- 274URDFW or MSI 321UP$671 · score 5.0
- 274URDFW or MSI 321URXW$868 · score 7.6
- 274URDFW or MSI 341QPXW14G$750 · score 4.8
- 274URDFW or Samsung LS32D606UANXGO$420 · score 3.2
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.