Asus VA279QG
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonUpdated Nov 12, 2026
Asus VA279QG costs $97 less today; Dell P2726H has score 0.4 higher (4.1 vs. 3.7).
3.7score
4.1score · higher
Asus wins 0by componentDell wins 1
Asus VA279QG is $97 the cheaperDell P2726H is the cheaper
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Both work. Asus VA279QG is $97 cheaper.
Both work. Asus VA279QG is $97 cheaper.
Both work. Asus VA279QG is $97 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk.
Dell P2726H wins on connections.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.1 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.4
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Updated 12/11/2026
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | Asus VA279QG | Dell P2726H |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $5.67 menor | $9.26 |
| Item | Asus VA279QG | Dell P2726H |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | General use and office | General use and office |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 82 ppi | 82 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Line changes | not listed | Dell Pro |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | VA279QG | P2726H |
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.