AOC Q27G3XMN
Today
Previous check$300
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.0 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAOC Q27G3XMN or BenQ PD2706U?
Q27G3XMN costs $100 less today; BenQ PD2706U has score 3.7 higher (8.7 vs. 5.0).
AOC Q27G3XMN
5.0score
BenQ PD2706U
8.7score · higher
AOC wins 0by componentBenQ wins 3
- 4.1Image9.5
- 6.5Smoothness·
- 5.0Connections6.0
- 4.0Ergonomics10.0
- ·Recency8.5
AOC Q27G3XMN is $100 the cheaperBenQ PD2706U is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for work and study
Only BenQ PD2706U works: General use, 23″ to 27″.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Only AOC Q27G3XMN works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Only AOC Q27G3XMN works: 120 Hz or more, 25″ to 32″.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only BenQ PD2706U works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)Up to $400On sale
Neither one fits: Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
BenQ PD2706U wins on image, connections and ergonomics.
- 4.1Image9.5 (wins)
- 6.5SmoothnessN/A
- 5.0Connections6.0 (wins)
- 4.0Ergonomics10.0 (wins)
- N/ARecency8.5
BenQ PD2706U
Today
Previous check$400
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
8.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet +3.7
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
Q27G3XMN
- Amazon Lowest price$300Buy on Amazon
BenQ PD2706U
- Amazon Lowest price$400Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | Q27G3XMN | BenQ PD2706U |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $11.11 menor | $14.81 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | Q27G3XMN | BenQ PD2706U |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | General use and office |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution changes | QHD | 4K |
| Pixel density changes | 109 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Panel changes | not listed | IPS |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | not listed | No |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR1000 | HDR 400 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 180 Hz | not listed |
| Response time (stated) changes | 1 ms | 5 ms |
| Response time measurement changes | not listed | GtG |
| Sync changes | not listed | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | 1 | not listed |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C changes | not listed | Yes |
| USB-C with laptop charging changes | not listed | Yes |
| Built-in speaker changes | not listed | No |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | not listed | Yes |
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | Q27G3XMN | PD2706U |
| Release year changes | not listed | 2025 |
Other comparisons
Q27G3XMN orLG TRUEBLACK400$335 · score 5.2Compare
BenQ PD2706U orAOC C27G2Z$380 · score 4.6Compare
BenQ PD2706U orAsus PA278CV$270 · score 3.4Compare
BenQ PD2706U orAsus XG27AQDMG$546 · score 7.6Compare
BenQ PD2706U orDell AW2523HF$339 · score 3.6Compare
BenQ PD2706U orDell P2725D$279 · score 5.5Compare
See more 12 comparisons
- BenQ PD2706U or Dell P2725H$285 · score 5.0
- BenQ PD2706U or LG 27G640A$300 · score 4.9
- BenQ PD2706U or LG 27G810A$400 · score 5.1
- BenQ PD2706U or LG 27GR83Q-B$280 · score 5.1
- BenQ PD2706U or LG 27U730SA$356 · score 5.3
- BenQ PD2706U or LG 27UN850$360 · score 4.5
- BenQ PD2706U or LG 27UP650K$279 · score 4.0
- BenQ PD2706U or LG TRUEBLACK400$335 · score 5.2
- BenQ PD2706U or MSI 272QP$390 · score 4.9
- BenQ PD2706U or MSI 272URDFA$287 · score 6.5
- BenQ PD2706U or MSI 274QPF$280 · score 5.1
- BenQ PD2706U or MSI 274QRFW$280 · score 6.8
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.