Acer EDA323QU
Today
Previous check$200
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.9
Buy on AmazonAcer EDA323QU or LG 32U701B?
Cost the same today; EDA323QU has score 1.9 higher (5.5 vs. 3.6).
Acer EDA323QU
5.5score · higher
LG 32U701B
3.6score
Acer wins 2by componentLG wins 1
- 3.0Image5.5
- 6.5Smoothness0.0
- 7.0Connections5.0
- 3.0Ergonomics·
- 10.0Recency·
Acer EDA323QU is the cheaperLG 32U701B is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Only Acer EDA323QU works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Only Acer EDA323QU works: 120 Hz or more, 25″ to 32″.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
EDA323QU wins on smoothness and connections; LG 32U701B wins on image.
- 3.0Image5.5 (wins)
- 6.5 (wins)Smoothness0.0
- 7.0 (wins)Connections5.0
- 3.0ErgonomicsN/A
- 10.0RecencyN/A
LG 32U701B
Today
Previous check$200
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
EDA323QU
- Amazon Lowest price$200Buy on Amazon
LG 32U701B
- Amazon Lowest price$200Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | EDA323QU | LG 32U701B |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $6.25 | $6.25 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | EDA323QU | LG 32U701B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | General use and office |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution changes | QHD | 4K |
| Pixel density changes | 92 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Panel changes | VA | not listed |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | Yes | not listed |
| Stated HDR changes | not listed | HDR10 |
| Line changes | Nitro | UltraFine |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 180 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 1 ms | not listed |
| Response time measurement changes | GtG | not listed |
| Sync changes | FreeSync | not listed |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | 2 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| Built-in speaker changes | Yes | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | No | not listed |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | No | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | EDA323QU | 32U701B |
| Release year changes | 2026 | not listed |
Other comparisons
EDA323QU orAcer SH322Q$168 · score 2.8Compare
LG 32U701B orLG 32GS60QC-B$180 · score 4.3Compare
EDA323QU orAOC CQ32G4VE$180 · score 4.5Compare
LG 32U701B orViewSonic VS3225$190 · score 3.4Compare- EDA323QU orLG 32GS60QC-B$180 · score 4.3Compare
LG 32U701B orBenQ EX271U$370 · score 6.1Compare
See more 10 comparisons
- EDA323QU or LG 32MR50C$170 · score 2.0
- LG 32U701B or Dell S2725DC$250 · score 4.2
- EDA323QU or MSI G32C4$178 · score 2.1
- LG 32U701B or Philips 221V8LB$65 · score 3.1
- EDA323QU or Samsung LS32C392EANXGO$200 · score 0.8
- EDA323QU or Samsung LS32D396GA$179 · score 2.2
- EDA323QU or Sceptre FWD240$150 · score 4.4
- EDA323QU or Sceptre U325W$160 · score 3.7
- EDA323QU or ViewSonic VA3209M$150 · score 1.7
- EDA323QU or ViewSonic VS3225$190 · score 3.4
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.