Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 12, 2026

Acer CB272 or Gigabyte M27Q2?

Acer CB272 costs $25 less today; Gigabyte M27Q2 has score 0.3 higher (5.5 vs. 5.2).

Acer CB272

5.2score

Gigabyte M27Q2

5.5score · higher

Acer wins 2by componentGigabyte wins 2

  • 2.8Image6.1
  • 9.5Smoothness7.5
  • 5.0Connections2.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics4.0

Acer CB272 is $25 the cheaper

The best for each use

By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.

Neither one fits: Monitors to use two on the desk.

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Acer CB272 wins on smoothness and connections; Gigabyte M27Q2 wins on image and ergonomics.

  • 2.8Image6.1 (wins)
  • 9.5 (wins)Smoothness7.5
  • 5.0 (wins)Connections2.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics4.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 12/11/2026

Acer CB272
Gigabyte M27Q2

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAcer CB272Gigabyte M27Q2
Price per inch$5.00 menor$5.93

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAcer CB272Gigabyte M27Q2
Screen
Type changesGeneral use and officeGaming (144 Hz or more)
Size27 ″27 ″
Resolution changesFull HDQHD
Pixel density changes82 ppi109 ppi
PanelIPSIPS
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curved screen changesnot listedNo
Stated HDR changesnot listedHDR 400
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes120 Hz200 Hz
Response time (stated)1 ms1 ms
Sync changesnot listedFreesync
Connections
HDMI ports changes1not listed
DisplayPort ports changes1not listed
USB-C changesnot listedYes
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesnot listedYes
VESA mount holes changesYesnot listed
General
Model code changesCB272M27Q2

Other comparisons

See more 1 comparison
How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.