Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
Today
Previous check$532
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.3 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonSamsung Galaxy A57 5G or Samsung Galaxy S25?
Galaxy A57 5G costs $208 less today; Galaxy S25 has score 1.4 higher (7.7 vs. 6.3).
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
6.3score
Samsung Galaxy S25
7.7score · higher
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G wins 2by componentSamsung Galaxy S25 wins 2
- 5.4Performance9.5
- 7.9Screen8.0
- 1.8Camera6.7
- 7.7Battery4.8
- 10.0Connectivity7.0
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G is $208 the cheaperSamsung Galaxy S25 is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Cell phones for gaming
Both work. Samsung Galaxy A57 5G is $208 cheaper.
Compact cell phones
Only Samsung Galaxy S25 works: 6.3-inch screen or smaller.
Neither one fits: Cell phones for seniors, Cell phones for photos, Best value cell phones, Cheap cell phones with NFC, Cheap 5G cell phones.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
Galaxy A57 5G wins on battery and connectivity; Galaxy S25 wins on performance and camera.
- 5.4Performance9.5 (wins)
- 7.9Screen8.0
- 1.8Camera6.7 (wins)
- 7.7 (wins)Battery4.8
- 10.0 (wins)Connectivity7.0
Samsung Galaxy S25
Today
Previous check$740
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.4
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
Galaxy A57 5G
- Amazon Lowest price$532Buy on Amazon
Galaxy S25
- Amazon Lowest price$740Buy on Amazon
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | Galaxy A57 5G | Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Chip changes | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| RAM changes | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage changes | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card | No | No |
| System | Android | Android |
| Factory software version changes | 16 | 15 |
| Screen | ||
| Size changes | 6.7″ | 6.2″ |
| Technology changes | AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Resolution changes | 1080 px x 2400 px | 2340 px x 1080 px |
| Peak brightness changes | 1,900 nits | not listed |
| Cameras | ||
| Main camera changes | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical zoom changes | not listed | 3× |
| Battery | ||
| Capacity changes | 5,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging changes | No | Yes |
| Connectivity and extras | ||
| Network | 5G | 5G |
| NFC (tap to pay) | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM changes | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack changes | Yes | not listed |
| Water and dust resistance changes | IP68 | not listed |
| General | ||
| Weight changes | 179 g | 162 g |
| Foldable changes | No | not listed |
| Charging connector | USB-C | USB-C |
Other comparisons
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the phone; the memory versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real-world photos or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.