44% below
Costs half what others charge for this score
The 78 models with a score between 7.8 and 8.8 have a median price of $1,250.
Updated Nov 6, 2026
$698
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
8.3out of 10
On 06/11, the best price of the day for the TV Samsung QN50QN70HAFXZC 50″ was $698 on Amazon, according to TV Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 06/11). The last 30 days of history are on TV Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $698.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 8.3 of 10 Above the median on 1 componente, tiedthe in 4.
No data on the spec sheet: gaming. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, it depends on how you use it: the reasons, compared with the rest of the catalog:
44% below
The 78 models with a score between 7.8 and 8.8 have a median price of $1,250.
#19 of 32
Among the 32 models in the $680 to $1,100 range, the median score is 8.6.
+1.0 in system
Operating system, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth above what the range delivers.
0 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the TV, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the TVs of similar size in today’s catalog.
$13.96 per inch
The 124 models from 43 to 55 inches cost $14.00 per inch (median). Math: $698 ÷ 50 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Higher score, similar price
Direct competitor in the range
Hisense
E7SF 50″$670
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Hisense
QD8SF 50″$698
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Samsung
UN55M80HAFXZC 55″$698
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Size | 50 inches |
| Resolution | 4K |
| Panel technology | Mini LED |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 3 |
| Sound and system | |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes |
| System | Tizen |
| General | |
| Release | 2026 |
The catalog doesn’t say: native refresh rate, brightness, dolby vision, hdr10+, hdmi 2.1, earc, vrr, usb ports, wi-fi, bluetooth, sound power, speakers and model code.
In November 6, 2026, Samsung QN50QN70HAFXZC 50″ costs $698 (score 8.3); the range median is $898 across 32 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, gaming, system, connections, audio e recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $698, checked in 06/11.
On Nov 6, 2026, the collected price of Samsung QN50QN70HAFXZC 50″ is $698. It’s the price from a trusted seller at the store on the collection date; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts in its favor: the 78 models with a score between 7.8 and 8.8 have a median price of $1,250, and Samsung QN50QN70HAFXZC 50″ costs $698, 44% below. In the $680 to $1,100 range, the median score of the 32 models is 8.6; Samsung QN50QN70HAFXZC 50″'s is 8.3, below the median, the 19º among them. By the spec sheet, the strong point is System (8.5, vs. 7.5 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point below the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure real contrast or durability.
The catalog confirms Dolby Atmos. Not confirmed in the specs: HDMI 2.1, Dolby Vision, eARC and VRR. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the TV doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the TV; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real contrast or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.