Which TV is better? Compare two
287 new TVs to compare on price, score and specs; collected 12 Nov.
Pick a size. Applies to all pages ·
287 new TVs, catalog as of 12 Nov 2026. The page address saves your choice.
- No proven discountscore 8.9score 8.9
Samsung
UN65M80HAFXZC 65″$898
Best price at Amazonchecked today
Why
Who it’s forSports and action
Pros30% below similar · Atmos
- No proven discountscore 9.3score 9.3
Samsung
QN48S90HAEXZC 48″$1,398
Best price at Amazonchecked today
Why
Who it’s forSports and action
ProsScreen 165 Hz · above average
ASamsung UN65M80HAFXZC 65″
BSamsung QN48S90HAEXZC 48″
Samsung UN65M80HAFXZC 65″ wins in 1 field, Samsung QN48S90HAEXZC 48″ in 3.
What each one has that the other lacks
- ASamsung UN65M80HAFXZC 65″wins in 1
- BSamsung QN48S90HAEXZC 48″wins in 3
- Collected price: Samsung UN65M80HAFXZC 65″ wins with $898 against $1,398, $500 less. The price collected today, from a trusted seller.
- Spec sheet score: Samsung QN48S90HAEXZC 48″ wins with 9.3 against 8.9, +0.4 pts. Sum of image, gaming, system, connections, audio e recency.
- image score: Samsung QN48S90HAEXZC 48″ wins with 9.0 against 8.3, +0.7 pts.
- Native refresh rate: Samsung QN48S90HAEXZC 48″ wins with 165 Hz against 144 Hz, +21 Hz. Smoother motion.
See full specsHide specs
| Field | Samsung UN65M80HAFXZC 65″ | Samsung QN48S90HAEXZC 48″ |
|---|---|---|
| Price and score | ||
| Collected price | $898 | $1,398 |
| Spec sheet score | 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Score by component | ||
| image score | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| gaming score | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| system score | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| connections score | no data | 10.0 |
| audio score | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| recency score | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Spec sheet | ||
| Screen size | 65 pol | 48 pol |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Panel technology | Mini LED | OLED |
| Native refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| System | Tizen | Tizen |
| HDMI ports | no data | 4 |
| Sound power | no data | no data |
| Model year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Features | ||
| HDMI 2.1 | no data | no data |
| Dolby Vision | no data | no data |
| eARC (soundbar) | no data | no data |
| Dolby Atmos | yes | yes |
Prices as of 12/11, they may change at the store. Score by specs, from 0 to 10. How we calculate →
Next step
Still undecided between the two?
See where each one stands among all the new TVs, by price and score.
Frequently asked questions
What does the comparison show?
Price, spec sheet score, the score of each component (image, gaming, system, connections, audio e recency) and the spec sheet: size, resolution, panel, refresh rate, HDMI and features. On each row with a rule, it marks which TV meets it.
Why do some fields show "no data"?
Because the catalog doesn’t list that detail for the TV, and we’d rather show the gap than make up a number. A field with no data on one side doesn’t count for either.
Where does the price of each TV come from?
This is the lowest price from a trusted Amazon seller on the date we checked. It changes without notice. The buy button goes straight to the store, where the price of the day applies.
Read next
Where the numbers come from
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. Who wins each row: the highest value for score, refresh rate and HDMI ports, whoever has the feature and, for price, the lowest. Size, resolution, panel and system appear without marking a winner, because bigger or more expensive doesn’t mean better.
The comparison uses the catalog specs and the Radar spec score. It doesn’t measure real contrast, durability or what buyers think.
Data from 12 Nov 2026.