Skip to content
TV Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Samsung QN77S85HAEXZC 77″ or Samsung QN77S90HAEXZC 77″?

QN77S85HAEXZC 77″ costs $500 less today; QN77S90HAEXZC 77″ has score 0.3 higher (9.3 vs. 9.0).

Samsung QN77S85HAEXZC 77″ wins 0by componentSamsung QN77S90HAEXZC 77″ wins 1

  • 9.0Image9.0
  • 8.5Gaming10.0
  • 8.5System8.5
  • 10.0Connections10.0
  • 9.0Audio9.0
  • 10.0Recency10.0

Samsung QN77S85HAEXZC 77″ is $500 cheaper

$2,798

today

No history yet

$3,298

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

QN77S90HAEXZC 77″ wins on gaming.

  • 9.0Image9.0
  • 8.5Gaming10.0 (wins)
  • 8.5System8.5
  • 10.0Connections10.0
  • 9.0Audio9.0
  • 10.0Recency10.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

QN77S85HAEXZC 77″
QN77S90HAEXZC 77″

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathQN77S85HAEXZC 77″QN77S90HAEXZC 77″
Price per inch$36.34 menor$42.83

Spec sheet side by side

ItemQN77S85HAEXZC 77″QN77S90HAEXZC 77″
Screen
Size77 inches77 inches
Resolution4K4K
Panel technologyOLEDOLED
Native refresh rate changes120Hz165Hz
Connections
HDMI ports44
Sound and system
Dolby AtmosYesYes
SystemTizenTizen
General
Release20262026
How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the TV; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real contrast or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.