Skip to content
TV Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Samsung QN55S85FAEXZC 55″ or TCL QM6K 55″?

QN55S85FAEXZC 55″ costs $166 less today and also has score 0.2 higher (8.7 vs. 8.5).

Samsung wins 1by componentTCL wins 1

  • 9.0Image8.3
  • 8.5Gaming8.5
  • 8.5System9.0
  • ·Audio9.0
  • 7.5Recency·

Samsung QN55S85FAEXZC 55″ is $166 cheaper

$1,448

today

No history yet

$1,614

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Neither one opens a 1-point lead on any component.

  • 9.0Image8.3
  • 8.5Gaming8.5
  • 8.5System9.0
  • N/AAudio9.0
  • 7.5RecencyN/A

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

QN55S85FAEXZC 55″
QM6K 55″

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathQN55S85FAEXZC 55″QM6K 55″
Price per inch$26.33 menor$29.34

Spec sheet side by side

ItemQN55S85FAEXZC 55″QM6K 55″
Screen
Size55 inches55 inches
Resolution4K4K
Panel technology changesOLEDMini LED
Native refresh rate120Hz120Hz
Sound and system
Dolby Atmos changesnot listedYes
System changesTizenGoogle TV
General
Release changes2025not listed

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the TV; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real contrast or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.