Skip to content
Laptop Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Asus TUF Gaming A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 170 RTX 3050 or MSI Thin 15.6″ Ryzen 7 7735HS RTX 4050?

TUF Gaming A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 170 RTX 3050 costs $34 less today and also has score 0.1 higher (7.1 vs. 7.0).

Asus wins 1by componentMSI wins 1

  • 7.0Performance7.6
  • 7.3Memory and storage7.3
  • 7.4Screen7.4
  • 6.3Ports and how current it is3.8

Asus TUF Gaming A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 170 RTX 3050 is $34 the cheaper

$1,598

today

No history yet

$1,632

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

TUF Gaming A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 170 RTX 3050 wins on ports and how current it is.

  • 7.0Performance7.6
  • 7.3Memory and storage7.3
  • 7.4Screen7.4
  • 6.3 (wins)Ports and how current it is3.8

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Spec sheet side by side

ItemTUF Gaming A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 170 RTX 3050Thin 15.6″ Ryzen 7 7735HS RTX 4050
Performance
ProcessorRyzen 7Ryzen 7
Processor model changes1707735HS
Dedicated graphics card changesRTX 3050RTX 4050
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD
Screen
Size15.6 polegadas15.6 polegadas
ResolutionFull HDFull HD
Refresh rate144Hz144Hz
Connections
Wi-Fi generation changesWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
General
SystemWindowsWindows
Model code changesFA506NCQ7735HS

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.