Asus ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060
Today
Typical price$2,499
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.9 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.1
Buy on AmazonAsus ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 or MSI Cyborg 17.3″ Core 9 270H RTX 5060?
ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 costs $170 less today and also has score 0.1 higher (7.9 vs. 7.8).
Asus ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060
7.9score · higher
Asus wins 2by componentMSI wins 1
- 8.7Performance9.1
- 7.3Memory and storage8.3
- 8.8Screen7.4
- 5.0Ports and how current it is3.8
Asus ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 is $170 the cheaperMSI Cyborg 17.3″ Core 9 270H RTX 5060 is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Laptops for study and basic use
Both work. Asus ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 is $170 cheaper.
Laptops for work and office
Only MSI Cyborg 17.3″ Core 9 270H RTX 5060 works: 8 GB of RAM, 256 GB and a mid-range processor.
Laptops for programming
Both work. Asus ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 is $170 cheaper.
Laptops for photo and video editing
Both work. Asus ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 is $170 cheaper.
Gaming laptops
Both work. Asus ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 is $170 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Light laptops to carry every day.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 wins on screen and ports and how current it is; Cyborg 17.3″ Core 9 270H RTX 5060 wins on memory and storage.
- 8.7Performance9.1
- 7.3Memory and storage8.3 (wins)
- 8.8 (wins)Screen7.4
- 5.0 (wins)Ports and how current it is3.8
MSI Cyborg 17.3″ Core 9 270H RTX 5060
Today
Typical price$2,669
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.8 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060
- Amazon Lowest price$2,499Buy on Amazon
Cyborg 17.3″ Core 9 270H RTX 5060
- Amazon Lowest price$2,669Buy on Amazon
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 | Cyborg 17.3″ Core 9 270H RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Processor changes | Core i7 | Core 9 |
| Processor model changes | 14650HX | 270H |
| Dedicated graphics card | RTX 5060 | RTX 5060 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage changes | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type changes | not listed | SSD |
| Screen | ||
| Size changes | 16 polegadas | 17.3 polegadas |
| Resolution changes | QHD | Full HD |
| Refresh rate changes | 165Hz | 144Hz |
| Connections | ||
| Wi-Fi generation changes | not listed | Wi-Fi 6E |
| General | ||
| System changes | not listed | Windows |
| Model code changes | 14650HX | WIN11 |
Other comparisons
ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 orMSI Vector 16 HX 16″ Core Ultra 7 255HX$2,684 · score 8.4Compare
Cyborg 17.3″ Core 9 270H RTX 5060 orLenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 16″ Core i7-14700HX RTX 2000$4,267 · score 8.1Compare
ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 orAsus ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-13650HX RTX 4060$1,059 · score 7.9Compare
ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 orMSI Katana 15 HX 15.6″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060$2,261 · score 8.2Compare
ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 orMSI Katana 15 HX 15.6″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5070$2,500 · score 8.5Compare
ROG Strix G16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5060 orMSI Katana A15 15.6″ Ryzen 9 8945HS RTX 4070$2,536 · score 8.6Compare
See more 1 comparison
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.