Skip to content
Laptop Radar

Updated 12 Nov 2026

Apple MacBook Air 15″ Apple M3 or MSI Cyborg 15.6″ Core 7 240H RTX 5050?

Cyborg 15.6″ Core 7 240H RTX 5050 costs $151 less today and also has score 0.1 higher (7.5 vs. 7.4).

Apple wins 2by componentMSI wins 1

  • 8.6Performance8.1
  • 7.3Memory and storage9.3
  • 8.0Screen7.4
  • 2.5Ports and how current it is2.5

MSI Cyborg 15.6″ Core 7 240H RTX 5050 is $151 the cheaper

The best for each use

By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.

Neither one fits: Light laptops to carry every day.

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Cyborg 15.6″ Core 7 240H RTX 5050 wins on memory and storage.

  • 8.6Performance8.1
  • 7.3Memory and storage9.3 (wins)
  • 8.0Screen7.4
  • 2.5Ports and how current it is2.5

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 12/11/2026

Spec sheet side by side

ItemMacBook Air 15″ Apple M3Cyborg 15.6″ Core 7 240H RTX 5050
Performance
Processor changesApple M3Core 7
Processor model changesM3240H
Dedicated graphics card changesnot listedRTX 5050
RAM changes16 GB32 GB
Storage changes512 GB1,024 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD
Screen
Size changes15 polegadas15.6 polegadas
Resolution changes3KFull HD
Screen type changesIPSnot listed
Refresh rate changesnot listed144Hz
General
System changesnot listedWindows
Model code changesnot listedB2RWEKG

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.