Skip to content
Laptop Radar

Updated 12 Nov 2026

Acer Nitro V 16″ Core 5 RTX 5050 or Asus TUF Gaming F16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5050?

Nitro V 16″ Core 5 RTX 5050 costs $100 less today; TUF Gaming F16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5050 has score 0.4 higher (7.0 vs. 6.6).

Acer wins 1by componentAsus wins 2

  • 7.0Performance8.4
  • 7.3Memory and storage7.3
  • 6.5Screen5.5
  • 3.8Ports and how current it is5.0

Acer Nitro V 16″ Core 5 RTX 5050 is $100 the cheaper

The best for each use

By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.

Neither one fits: Light laptops to carry every day.

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Nitro V 16″ Core 5 RTX 5050 wins on screen; TUF Gaming F16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5050 wins on performance and ports and how current it is.

  • 7.0Performance8.4 (wins)
  • 7.3Memory and storage7.3
  • 6.5 (wins)Screen5.5
  • 3.8Ports and how current it is5.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 12/11/2026

Spec sheet side by side

ItemNitro V 16″ Core 5 RTX 5050TUF Gaming F16 16″ Core i7-14650HX RTX 5050
Performance
Processor changesCore 5Core i7
Processor model changesnot listed14650HX
Dedicated graphics cardRTX 5050RTX 5050
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage type changesSSDnot listed
Screen
Size16 polegadas16 polegadas
ResolutionFull HDFull HD
Screen type changesIPSnot listed
Connections
Wi-Fi generationWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
General
System changesnot listedWindows
Model code changesANV1614650HX

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.